

|
Indocentric view |
|
Home | About us | Contact Us | Subscribe | FAQs |
|
India’s Imperatives in IBSA Forum Abdul Nafey
BRIC is not IBSA plus 2. IBSA is the first grouping to link three continents in the post-Cold War world. It is a nucleus of a new Afro-Asian and Latin American solidarity that is grounded in the multiethnic democratic character of the three countries. When IBSA Forum was being deliberated upon, it was the democratic character of the rainbow countries that had appealed to India. Perhaps that had also become the reason not to invite China to the Forum. IBSA and BRIC would complement each other but the unique geographical and political complementarity within IBSA means that the trajectory of its developments would be quite distinct.
IBSA Navies: Exploring Maritime Multilateralism Dr. Vijay Sakhuja
It is an acknowledged fact that a secure environment can never be achieved by the efforts of a single country. It requires mutual understanding and cooperation of all the countries and for that, it is necessary to share the common values on the benefits of cooperation to be enjoyed by the whole maritime community. In that context, during their interaction in early 2007, Vice Admiral J Mudimu and Admiral Sureesh Mehta , Chiefs of the South African and Indian Navy endorsed the need to ‘formulate a system of regional cooperation in the Indian Ocean Region to combat threats emanating from non-state actors, particularly those related to terrorism, armed robbery and piracy’. The outcome was the trilateral IBSAMAR-I naval exercise held from May 5 – 16, 2008.
IBSA Free Trade Agreement- Opportunities and Challenges The idea of IBSA is without precedent. IBSA was an agreement of three stable democracies belonging to three different continents with complementary comparative advantages. These are growing economies with combined population of 1.4 billion, a combined GDP of over USD 3.2 trillion and account for 3-4 % of global economic output. The trilateral trade amongst IBSA countries reached US10 billion in 2008-09 and they are quite optimistic to make its at US 25 billion by 2015. These three economies are beginning to play an increasing role in world affairs. There are key factors for the success of IBSA that represents a radical shift from the way developing countries interacting with each other. For many years, developing countries have been quoted as the source of cheap labour and raw material. But IBSA has three developing countries together with a mega economic mission and this will define a new way for their partnership with the north. The world economy in the future will be driven by the developing countries and regional groupings such as IBSA will be playing a pivotal role. IBSA counters are already leading in that direction with India’s GDP growing at 8%, Brazil 3%and South Africa 6%. It has unleashed the potential for more investment, more tourism, and more interaction between people to people and institution to institution. The success of IBSA lay in the amalgamation of thoughts of three continents brought together by India, Brazil and South Africa. Main forums like G-8 also have recognized the importance of IBSA as that is the reason why IBSA nations are invited to their meetings.
IBSA: A New Forum For South-South CooperationDr. Arunoday Bajpai IBSA as a forum of South-South Cooperation faces some challenges also. First, the nature of Cooperation between them is bilateral rather than trilateral in nature. Their efforts for deepening South-South Cooperation has been more in the form of declarations and pronouncements rather than concrete programme of action. Second, many times they have displayed diverse interests and perceptions on various issues. the trade data reveals that the IBSA members have more trade and business with rich countries than among themselves. They have opposite interests as for as trade related issues are concerned. During Doha Round of trade negotiations in July, 2008, India and Brazil ended on opposite sides. The safeguards demanded by India and other poor Countries to protect their Agriculture were not included in the Proposals supported by Brazil and rich countries. Brazil is interested to gain access to the US market for its agricultural products. Again, India is not ready to open its markets for agricultural imports, whereas two other members do not have any such reservation. They also have diverse regional interests. India is the only nuclear power in IBSA and faces the problem of terrorism and other two members may not go along her in this regard. Third, besides competition in trade, the Continent of Africa has become a theatre of competition among three countries to promote their interests and area of influence. The competition is acrimonious and tough as China has also a vigorous programme to increase her influence in Africa. Fourth, however, the biggest challenge before IBSA in deepening the South-South Cooperation is to bring the poor countries of the South within the ambit of such cooperation. At present, IBSA is more integrated with rich countries in global economy rather the with the poor countries of the South. The litmus test for IBSA is to balance the opposite interests of the most poor and the most rich in the globe.
Chinese Influence on IBSA and India’s National Interests: Pretence of Ambivalence? Akshay K. Singh
IBSA Forum is constituted as strategic alliance for the pursuit of common interests of developing countries of the South in global institutions as well as a platform for bi‐trilateral and interregional South‐South cooperation. Despite remarkable success of IBSA, and given the fact that IBSA was organised around a particular political identity and special objectives of meeting constituent states’ particular interests at various international fronts, the debate of inclusion and non-inclusion pose profound stress on the existing members to shed off ambivalence and realise their own untapped potential to make it a unique forum in the global South. This paper analyses the futility of the debate of inclusion of China on the basis of multiple competing interests and conflicting positions on various regional and global issues. India, realising many inconvenient truths, needs to see its interests in mutuality; in the first place it can better be strengthened by sectoral working groups (SWGs). Apart from this, India along with other two states of IBSA needs to earnestly concentrate on the cooperation in the areas of particular countries’ core competency. The cooperation in the core competency areas of three IBSA states can be in the services areas, in energy sector, cooperation among MNCs of three member states, and most importantly, IBSA-FTA. IBSA FTA is to involve an FTA between two strong Regional Trade Agreements (RTA) and one country, which is MERCOSUR, SACU and India. Finally, India must mull over integrating the incongruent value chain if the fuller potential of this ingenious inter-regional group is to be realised. This certainly demands to shed off inertia and speeding up the activities within defined realm of approaches to accomplish the aim of the most distinctive grouping of the South.
|
